Evaluation of different irrigation regimes in preparation for the implementation of combined irrigation systems for the re-use of leached water
VegetablesEvaluation of different irrigation regimes in preparation for the implementation of combined irrigation systems for the re-use of leached water
Shabtai Cohen, Ami Maduel, Rivka Offenbach, Yoram Zvieli, Israel Tsabari, Rami Golan – Central and Northern Arava R&D
Eviatar Ityel - Extension Service (Shaham), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
Alon Ben-Gal – Environmental Physics and Irrigation, Gilat Research Center, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO)
Naftali Lazarovitch – Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
E-mail address for correspondence: sab@inter.net.il
Keywords: pepper, Capsicum, evapotranspiration, Sodom Valley, recycled water
Abstract
In order to conserve water and optimize the use of fertilizer, two model farms have been set up at Moshav Paran (the Barry-Porat farm and the Steiglitz farm), with the goal of reducing irrigation and fertilizer levels through the collection and re-use of water that drains from raised/artificial beds. The drainage water is collected from these beds and re-used. A third of the total area is devoted to raised/artificial beds and, in the remaining two-thirds, pepper is grown directly in the ground. Growth relations have been determined to allow the use of large irrigation volumes in these raised/artificial beds. These volumes are necessary to rinse the salts from the root zone and allow for the use of an irrigation system involving the standard water pressures that need to be used with raised/artificial beds, which are based on the fact that the volume of growth medium in the root zone in this type of system is smaller than it is for crops grown in the ground. On the other hand, a collection area is needed for the drained water, so that the appropriate amount of water can be used. All of this is necessary for the optimal functioning of this cropping system.
When the water quality is 3 dS/m, the amount of water used is up to three times the amount lost to evapotranspiration (ET3). This volume allows good rinsing of salts from the growth medium, but also requires the use of a relatively large area to collect the water that drains from the raised/artificial beds. The lower the ratio of the area of the crop grown in the growth media to the area of the crop in the soil, the greater the efficiency of the system. Today, the quality of the water that reaches the field or other cropping area before fertilizer is applied has an electrical conductivity of between 2.5 and 3.5 dS/m. When the water is of a higher quality, smaller volumes are needed to rinse away salts.
In an experiment conducted during the 2010/11 growing season, we evaluated the irrigation program needed when irrigating with water of the quality associated with desalinated water. The quality and quantity of the collected drainage water may have different effects on crop performance. The experiment was conducted in a plastic-covered greenhouse at the Zohar Research Station in Sodom Valley. Peppers (cv. Celica) were transplanted into the greenhouse on 13 September 2010. The quality of the irrigation water was 0.3 dS/m. The examined variable was the level of irrigation, which was determined based on the ET MAX (maximum evapotranspiration) as obtained in a treatment with the highest ET (the amount used to allocate the water and as a basis for all of the irrigation treatments). Four different irrigation levels were evaluated: 0.7 ET, 0.9 ET, 1.1 ET and 1.3 ET. These figures were calculated based on the difference between the readings from the irrigation meters and the amount of drainage water. Over the course of the experiment, the irrigation water and drainage water were sampled and the fruit was harvested, weighed and sorted.
The results of this experiment indicate that when high-quality water is used for irrigation, the drainage water can be used at a level of 16% without incurring any yield damage (Treatment ET 1.1). Increasing the amount of drainage water used to nearly 30% did not improve yield, did not affect the level of transpiration and led to an unnecessary excess of drained water. These findings indicate that in integrated systems involving raised/artificial beds, crops grown in the ground and the collection of drainage water, the use of desalinated water is more efficient than the use of saline water. For the quality of the water available in the Arava, we need two units of “collection” area to absorb the drainage water from each unit of “donor” area. When desalinated water is used, we need a collection area of no more than 10%. That is, the receiving efficiency is 90% without the problems observed when water is recycled in closed systems.
שפה English
מחבר Shabtai Cohen, Ami Maduel, Rivka Offenbach, Yoram Zvieli, Israel Tsabari, Rami Golan, Eviatar Ityel, Alon Ben-Gal, Naftali Lazarovitch
שנה 2011
שייכות yzvieli
תאריך יצירה 14/3/2012
תאריך עדכון 14/3/2012

