Effects of root zone infrastructure, irrigation quantity and mode of compost application on organically grown pepper
Vegetables10
חום או ענף אורגני; ירקות
תאריך עדכון 14/3/2012
Effects of root zone infrastructure, irrigation quantity and mode of compost application on organically grown pepper
Ityel Eviatar – Extension Service (Shaham) Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
D. Chashmonai, A. Oshoroviz, R. Offenbach, Y. Zvieli, I. Tsabari – Central and Northern Arava R&D
E-mail address for correspondence: Eviatar@arava.co.il
Abstract
In the Nasham restricted root zone system, a capillary barrier is used to derive high moisture levels from small volumes of water. Decreasing the volume of irrigation water applied to organic pepper crops is expected to provide great advantages in terms of fertilizer costs, as well as more efficient water use. The quantities of fertilizer dissolved in the irrigation water are expected to decrease greatly in light of the smaller irrigation volumes, thereby decreasing the contamination of the groundwater with nitrates. The trouble with the application of this method is the fact that the use of buried sheeting that surrounds roots (Palrig side-sheeting) is prohibited in organic agricultural systems. Due to the hydraulic characteristics of this sheeting, it provides for a significant decrease in the horizontal movement of water in the soil, which leads to improved removal of salts. The model that is permitted for use in organic agricultural systems includes only a barrier, without any side-sheeting.
Pepper plants (cv. Sobek; Zeraim Gedera) were transplanted into a screen-house at the Yair Experimental Station on 1 August 2010. We examined two irrigation levels, a low level and a high level. The lower irrigation level was approx. 40% lower than the higher level. At the end of the growing season, the total volumes of irrigation applied were 760 and 1,240 m3/dunam, respectively. The irrigation levels were evaluated in two different root-zone infrastructure systems. A system with a layer of gravel buried 40 cm below the soil surface that served as a barrier was compared with a control infrastructure treatment in which the soil had not been dug up. In both infrastructure treatments and both irrigation treatments, we evaluated two ways of applying compost: (1) burying the compost under tilled soil and (2) spreading the compost on the soil surface.
The dry weight of all of the fruit (that which had been harvested and that which was still green on the vine at the end of the study) and the dry weight of the canopy were lower in the low-level irrigation treatment than in the high-level irrigation treatment (differences of 13% for fruit and 15% for canopy). The barrier infrastructure treatment was inferior to the control in terms of dry-weight yield and harvested fruit. There was a 7% difference between the infrastructure treatments. The two methods of applying compost (distribution on the soil surface or burial under loosened soil) did not differentially affect any of the measured variables.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the staff of Arava R&D for their help with this work and the Plant Board for their financial support of this project.
שפה English
מלות מפתח Capsicum
מחבר Ityel Eviatar, Dorit Chashmonai, Avi Oshoroviz, Rivka Offenbach, Yoram Zvieli, Israel Tsabari
שנה 2011
שייכות yzvieli
תאריך יצירה 14/3/2012
תאריך עדכון 14/3/2012

