Research

Filter results

Department
Clear
Author
Type
Dates
Clear
FROM
TO

Research

  • 9
    Dec
    Feeding experiment in Corydoras aeneus fish
    Aquaculture

    17
    תחום או ענף דגים
    תאריך עדכון 14/3/2012

    Feeding experiment in Corydoras aeneus fish
    Nitzan Reiss Hevlin, Tal Gur, Moti Userovich and Dan Popper – Central and Northern Arava R&D
    Email: nitzanr@arava.co.il

    Abstract
    Corydoras fish are members of the Family Callichthyidae that are native to South American rivers (in Argentina, Colombia and Venezuela). They are found near the bottom of these rivers, close to the ground. In nature, these fish live in streams and creeks in which the water is clear and flows slowly. Corydoras fish are omnivores and, in the wild, feed on insect larvae, worms and the remains of plants, which they find on the river bottom. They also eat the corpses of other fish. In home aquariums, Corydoras are used as cleaner fish and are responsible for removing uneaten feed and the remains of other fish. When Corydoras fish are raised in closed systems in which water is recycled, the type of feed used is very important.
    We evaluated the effects of different types of feed on the growth (weight and length) and survival of the Corydoras species Corydoras paleatus. In an experiment that was conducted at the Yair Experimental Station in 2010, we tested four types of feed. We found that MEM feed gave the best results in terms of the growth and uniformity of the fish (with an average fish weighing 0.558 g as compared to 0.446-0.434 g for the fish in the other treatments). The addition of algae to the aquarium improved the growth results in all of the feed treatments, except for the MEM treatment, in which the growth results were good even without the addition of any algae.

    שפה English
    מלות מפתח Keywords: Fish food, fish nutrition, ornamental fish, catfish
    מחבר Nitzan Reiss Hevlin, Tal Gur, Moti Userovich, Dan Popper
    שנה 2011
    שייכות yzvieli
    תאריך יצירה 14/3/2012
    תאריך עדכון 14/3/2012

  • 8
    Dec
    Prevention of phytotoxic effect of fungicides applied via drenching for powdery mildew control on pepper
    Plant Protection, Vegetables

    13
    תחום או ענף הגה"צ; ירקות

    תאריך עדכון 14/3/2012

    Prevention of phytotoxic effect of fungicides applied via drenching for powdery mildew control on pepper
    Shimon Pivonia, Rachel Levite, Ami Maduel – Central and Northern Arava R&D
    E-mail address for correspondence: ShimonP@arava.co.il

    Abstract
    Powdery mildew is the main canopy disease of pepper crops in the Arava. This disease is caused by the fungus Leveillula taurica, which develops inside the leaf tissue and destroys that tissue. The mycelia and spores that emerge from the leaf provide the characteristic white dusting that looks similar to flour. (Translator’s note: The Hebrew term for “powdery mildew” is derived from the word for “flour”.) The disease appears every growing season. Pepper is planted in the Arava beginning in late July and powdery mildew appears in the fields when the temperature drops. There is a 6 to 8 week period during which conditions for powdery mildew development are generally optimal. After this period, the rate of powdery mildew development decreases.
    In experiments carried out at the R&D Authority, it was found that the disease could be prevented and/or its severity could be significantly reduced throughout the season if disease development could be inhibited during this critical period. Similarly, it was found that a single drench application of fungicide could protect pepper plants against powdery mildew for 3 to 4 weeks. Two properly timed fungicide drenches can protect the plant from powdery mildew throughout the period of optimal disease development. The use of this method eliminates the need for many sprays and improves control efficacy. As the use of this technique has spread to the majority of pepper plots in the Arava, we have observed some incidents of phytotoxicity caused by azoxystrobin, which is found in Amistar, as well as Extra granules. In this work, we evaluated the significance of this damage in terms of yield in a cultivar that is particularly sensitive to phytotoxicity, as well as ways to minimize this damage.
    We examined the Ramiro-type pepper cv. Madonna, which is sensitive to drench-applied material. We observed leaves yellowing and dropping off of the plants and a decreased rate of growth that persisted for about a month after the last drench. In terms of yield, we observed a delay in harvests throughout March, but there was no effect on overall yield, fruit size or fruit quality. Distributing the same total amount of fungicide across a greater number of application treatments (with a lower application rate) did not decrease the signs of phytotoxicity on the plants. In an accompanying experiment in line 4833 grown using a Spanish trellis system, we observed signs of phytotoxicity at the shoot meristems following the application of azoxystrobin. However, in that experiment, the fungicide treatment did not affect the rate of yield accumulation or overall yield. It is possible that the relatively high level of phytotoxicity observed in cv. Madonna is related to the use of a Dutch trellising system, in which the majority of the material reaches one shoot meristem of each plant as opposed to multiple meristems in the Spanish trellising system.
    To date, we have not observed any phytotoxicity problems for the triazoles, such as Hosen. The other products permitted for use as drenches to control powdery mildew of pepper are Amistar and similar fungicides, which are strobilurins and Extra granules, which contain a triazole (Atemi) and a strobilurin (azoxystrobin). We recommend that growers who apply fungicide drenches continue to apply two drenches each season with chemicals from different families, except perhaps in particularly sensitive cultivars. This will significantly decrease the risk of fungicide resistance, ensuring the usefulness of this method for many years to come.

    Acknowledgement
    We thank the Plant Board for their financial support of this work.

    שפה English
    מלות מפתח Capsicum
    מחבר Shimon Pivonia, Rachel Levite, Ami Maduel
    שנה 2011
    שייכות yzvieli
    תאריך יצירה 14/3/2012
    תאריך עדכון 14/3/2012

  • 15
    Nov
    Weather Determined Relative Sensitivity of Plants to Salinity: Quantification and Simulation.
    Aquaculture
  • 8
    Apr
    Integrated control of Monosporascus cannonballus, the causal agent of sudden wilt of melons
    Plant Protection, Vegetables

    16
    תחום או ענף הגה"צ; ירקות

    תאריך עדכון 14/3/2012

    Integrated control of Monosporascus cannonballus, the causal agent of sudden wilt of melons
    Shimon Pivonia, Rachel Levite, Ami Maduel – Central and Northern Arava R&D
    E-mail address for correspondence: ShimonP@arava.co.il

    Abstract
    Melon is an important crop in the Arava. The main soilborne disease affecting melon in the Arava and elsewhere in southern Israel is the sudden wilting caused by the fungus Monosporascus cannonballus. To date, there is still no substitute for methyl bromide for controlling this disease in spring melon crops. The goal of this research is the development of methods for controlling Monosporascus in the Arava without methyl bromide or any negative yield effects. Experiments concerning ways to inhibit this disease were conducted over four years (2006-2010) at the Zohar Experimental Station in Sodom Valley. There were two cropping seasons each year, a short fall season during which melon was grown in the open field and a long spring season during which melon was grown in walk-in tunnels. We also evaluated ways to control weeds in spring melon crops. We evaluated the effects of a combination of methods, disinfection in the fall, destruction of the remains of the fall crop with Edigan (metham sodium) and the application of fungicide during the season, on the morbidity of the plants and crop yield over three years in the spring and fall seasons.
    We found that the most influential factor was the use of fungicide. The use of a combination of methods led to increased yield in spring melon. The combination of control methods did not contribute to increased yields in fall melon crops. Applying mycorrhizae to the plants led to fewer plants dying in the fall crop and helped increase yield in comparison with the control treatment. However, in the spring crop, the use of mycorrhizae did not have any positive effects on plant morbidity or yield. The use of the herbicide Goal (oxyflurofen) before the spring melon was transplanted had no negative yield effect. We found that the use of black/silver (lower/upper sides) plastic to help control weeds in the spring crop may have a negative effect on yield. If methyl bromide can not be used in spring melon in the Arava, we recommend the following: a soil disinfection treatment in the fall + application of fungicide during the fall season + destruction of the remains of the fall crop with metham sodium + application of fungicides during the spring season. Of all of these treatments, treatment with fungicide is the most significant. A combination of the application of methyl bromide before the spring season and the application of fungicide during the season provides significantly increased yields.

    Acknowledgement
    We thank the office of the Chief Scientist of the Ministry of Agriculture for funding research project no. 603-0243-08.

    שפה English
    מחבר Shimon Pivonia, Rachel Levite, Ami Maduel
    שנה 2011
    שייכות yzvieli
    תאריך יצירה 14/3/2012
    תאריך עדכון 14/3/2012